Editorial QA and review process
Every release is checked for model consistency, source traceability, calculation regressions, visible assumptions and wording. This is an internal quality-control process, not an external facility-operator endorsement. No unnamed expert reviewer is claimed.
Storage Size Lab Editorial QA
Role: Internal data and consistency check
An internal release check covering model consistency, source traceability, calculation tests, visible assumptions and wording. It is not an external facility-operator endorsement.
What the internal check covers
- Whether every dimension and cost figure resolves to the shared versioned dataset
- Whether calculators agree for the same inventory and assumptions
- Whether assumptions, ranges, limitations and source dates are visible
- Whether automated model, link, schema and browser tests pass
What this does not prove
Internal QA does not prove that every facility has the stated interior dimensions, door clearance, policies or price. It is not a substitute for a named external facility professional. Users must confirm physical measurements and current terms with the facility.
Which pages carry a review
| Page type | Reviewed | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Size guides | Internal QA | Dataset consistency and limitation wording |
| What fits pages | Internal QA | Inventory arithmetic and model consistency |
| Cost pages | Internal QA | Range calculations, sources and review date |
| Vehicle storage | Internal QA | Warnings to confirm facility policy and dimensions |
| Guides | Internal QA | Claims, links and consistency with methodology |
| Policy pages | Editorial check | Truthfulness against current site behavior |
Every checked page shows the internal QA function and last-checked date. If a qualified external reviewer is engaged later, their real name, credentials and exact review scope must be published before any expert-review claim is added.